Mamaroneck Village Freezes Major New Building

In a 4-1 vote, trustees vote a six-month moratorium on large-scale development while they consider ways to protect what remains of open space.

Mamaroneck Village imposed a moratorium on large subdivisions for at least half a year on Monday night, while it reviews safeguards for open space.

Over the objections of Deputy Mayor Louis Santoro and most speakers at a public hearing, the Board of Trustees voted, 4-1 to adopt the temporary ban. A new local law halts for six months any development of land large enough to accommodate four or more units unless it has already been approved by a land-use board.

Some half-dozen speakers addressed the village board, with most of them opposed to the hiatus. They contended that today’s bad economy made any large residential development unlikely, that its imposition sent the wrong signal to prospective businesses and that it would almost certainly last longer than six months.

“Don’t put the sign out that says, ‘We’re closed,’" Daniel K. Pfeffer of Larchmont, executive managing director of the firm that owns the Hampshire Country Club, warned the board. “That’s what a moratorium does.” His Manhattan-based real estate firm, New World Realty Advisors LLC, bought the defunct club last year for $12.1 million and has spent some $3 million, he said, refurbishing the clubhouse and grounds. 

With more than 100 wooded acres off Cove Road—representing some of the village’s last remaining land capable of large-scale development—Hampshire feels especially targeted by the development freeze. “We believe that a moratorium is directed at Hampshire,” Pfeffer said. While there are no plans now to develop the property beyond its 18-hole golf course, he insisted Monday, New World intends to preserve its right to build “should we choose to do so.”  

Village officials deny that Hampshire had been singled out, saying the moratorium will apply to other large tracts like proposals for a five-unit development on Highview Street, a dozen townhomes on Boston Post Road and a six-unit subdivision off Fenimore Road.

The local law adopted Monday affects not only undeveloped land but also underdeveloped properties with the potential for denser building.

Some speakers, while not directly addressing Hampshire’s concerns, called any development pause a flawed policy. “I have a fundamental problem,” said Mauro Gabriele, “that during one of the worst economic climates in the nation’s history, the village is putting out a sign saying, ‘We’re not open for business.’ “

Gabriele, a real estate consultant and onetime zoning board member, put the chances of development in today’s “downtrodden economy” at “slim and none.”

For its part, the Coordinating Council of Neighborhood Associations applauded the moratorium. In a resolution presented to the board by spokesman Daniel S. Natchez,  the council called on the village to “take a hard look at the desired future, character and environmental effects” of developing “large open land spaces.”

But Gary D. Hirsch, a self-described five-year resident with “no ax to grind,” said he was “very disturbed” by the moratorium proposal. “This is a bad mistake,” he said, advising the trustees, “You’re not allowed to make bad mistakes in bad times.”

Nancy C. Wasserman August 18, 2011 at 03:50 PM
The moratorium is redundant. A prior administration ended any possibilty of large or small scale development by changing the FAR(floor area ratio). In other words, to make it simple, there will be no development because it will not be profitable to build and then sell.Note the eyesore on Boston Post Road and Delancey Avenue that is now bank owned.Or the other large lot on Barry and Post Road.Among others. No tax relief by broadening the tax base with a bit of development. And yes, I do know what I am speaking about and have a vested interest because I am a commercial real estate broker and a resident of The Village of Mamaroneck. Controlled development as in The Town of Mamaroneck can only be good for those who are having issues with their taxes. Yes, I am a member of the Board of Assessment Review.I have some idea about what is going on locally. A bit of research would have precluded the contentious discussions that have taken place relative to the moratorium. Stop bickering and take not of bad times and how we can remedy them locally. As Mr. Hirsch says, bad mistake in bad times Nancy C. Wasserman
Nancy C. Wasserman February 12, 2013 at 02:52 PM
Now what happens to the plans relative to the TOD study.? Nothing changes.
LifeLongResident February 12, 2013 at 03:35 PM
Hi Nancy, Nice to see you follow the Patch, our kids went to school together. I saw your comment and wasn't aware of this issue. Can you tell me why this two year old article is relevant now?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »