Village Attorney Michael McDermott placed himself squarely in the middle on Monday of a long-running, seemingly intractable quarrel over noise in downtown Mamaroneck.
Specifically, McDermott, who wears a town justice’s black robe when he’s not giving the village legal advice, will try to mediate the collision of interests that occurs when late night commerce and high rise housing are located within shouting distance of one another.
McDermott’s latest assignment follows yet another high-decibel meeting in which Mike Hynes, owner of the restaurant and sports bar at 211 Mamaroneck Ave., and nearby residents—chiefly those who live in the Regatta condominium complex at 123 Mamaroneck Ave., a half block away— threw jabs while village officials moderated the action.
With 9,000 square feet of space inside and multiple decks outside, the pub attracts large numbers of patrons for dining and drinks. It’s open Sunday through Wednesday until 2 a.m. and till 4 a.m. at all other times.
Monday’s contentious meeting—held in a conference room within the Regatta and hosted by the village board of trustees—placed the long-simmering controversy in sharp relief. “It isn’t fair to us,” complained Regatta resident Lucia Tatavitto, who will represent Spillane’s’ neighbors in the McDermott mediation effort.
"Something really needs to be done,” she said. “We shouldn’t have to call the police department every night.”
Indeed, one of the issues raised Monday was whether the fight to curb noise pollution was best waged through policing or code enforcement, or a combination of both.
But some angry residents complained that the police turn, well, a deaf ear to their noise complaints. “We elect the people sitting in this room,” said Jean Starace, another Regatta resident. “Why aren’t we given the same respect as Molly Spillane’s gets?” She charged that the police were being insufficiently proactive in enforcing noise ordinances.
Police Chief Christopher Leahy, who attended the meeting, denied any lack of vigor in his force’s policing efforts and said, “If he [Hynes] doesn’t comply, he’s issued a summons.”
Hynes, for his part, insisted that he does comply with village regulations and argues that any establishment like his, given its large number of patrons and music, will inevitably generate a certain volume of noise—and it should be expected from a business in a downtown commercial zone.
Village Manager Richard Slingerland told the meeting that nothing in the law allows the village to deny Spillane’s a cabaret license.
McDermott, the mediator and a town justice in Somers, explained, “There are competing interests here. He has the right to run his business and you have the right to enjoy your home.”
For Solange DeSantis, that’s precisely what she asks. “We’re entitled,” the Regatta resident said, “to enjoy our quality of life.”
Saying, “I don’t know what more we can do about it,” she asked the board, “There are noise ordinances. Are they going to be enforced?”
Trustee John Hofstetter, in a word of caution to both sides, noted that the village board, put in the middle of this dispute, could dictate a resolution that’s unlikely to be warmly embraced by either side. “Nobody’s going to be entirely happy with the results,” he warned. “Everybody will be unhappy.”
The statement above poses the ever present question in the Village. You can change the word "noise ordinances" for leaf blower laws, FEMA regulations, flood mitigation measures, zoning laws, building codes, tree laws or land ownership laws and the question is always the same, when will the Village start enforcing our laws uniformly? Why is it so hard for the Village follow it's own laws? This is issue has been going on for a couple years now and the politicians keeps shining on the residents of the Regatta. Either Molly Spillane's is in violation of the noise ordinance or they are not. Why is it so hard for the Village to make that simple determination?
I agree with everything you said except the above statement. As you can see from many of the other posts, there is no connection between being in violation and receiving a summons. I live next to a street where a developer did work,TEN years ago, in violation of approved plans and village code, it has cost taxpayers $100,000 and the village has never taken any action to enforce our laws. There is a house in Orienta that was built out of compliance with the approved plans and FEMA floodplain regulations and the Village has done nothing to make the owners bring it into compliance. Months ago, $35-50,000 dollars of village trees were removed illegally by a developer and the Village hasn't done anything to recoup the village's loss. Everybody in Villlage government, knows about these things and yet there is no will to enforce our laws.
When asked why no summons were being issued, the answer was "this is a code enforcement issue", but the code enforcer doesn't work on the weekends, so no summons can be issued for noise complaints. Most of the Village Trustees in attendance could care less about the Regattas noise problems. All they did was smile and smerk at each other.
Some things reported that never addressed why code is not being followed- Mr. Slingerland reported that code needs to be changed, Trustee Santoro reported that the village wished to hire a night time code enforcement officer but the board voted it down. The village attorney discussed all of the various codes pertaining to the operation of such an establishment except for discussion of the code pertaining to noise. Political hot potato does not serve anyone's interests well. The question that I thought I heard asked was why enforcement of noise code is not being adhered to procedurally. Maybe reading the code book needs to be required reading for all village officials so they can intelligently handle situations such as these.
yea, and thats a good thing, not a bad thing as you seem to be implying. We live in a village that is alive and lively, not some storagee place for people waiting to die. Many of us like the European feel to main street, rather than some generic efficient-commerce-only soul-less bland strip. You can't find plenty of those if you want. As for Molly's - they need to get on this side of reasonable, or move on to the Boston Post rd. - the shut down BBQ place next to Brewers would do.
Looking at all the customers on the street in the village, it seems like commerce is doing just fine. The merchants appear to be very busy, and there's not much vacancy. As for Molly's they are merely doing the same thing as the other merchants, trying to make a living. It's up to the VOM to figure out a balance, they are the ones that created the codes and ordinances and now can't figure out how to enforce them. I repeat the VOM should have considered how having a bar/restaurant so close to the Regatta would impact the residents. It's the VOM's responsilibity to proectect it's citizens and they clearly did not.
"last time I looked we were in Mamaroneck, NY, USA" Yea, thats right, USA, land of the free, not land of the oppressed. And the commerce is doing fine precisely because its an attractive place to come with its eating options and liveliness. If you want to see a dying village main st. drive up HalsteadAve. to Harrison. Multiple empty storefronts and others closing. Its dead quiet with plenty of empty sidewalks. You'd love it there.