.
Feedback

Latimer Supports Mandate Relief Bills

With many local municipalities citing mandate relief as a major stumbling block to balancing tight budgets, Assemblyman George Latimer offers a solution.

 

The below content was excerpted from a press release sent out by Assemblyman Latimer's office.

"There's a lot of rhetoric going on out there about mandate relief for local governments; it's time to separate the snake-oil from the real solutions." So states Assemblyman Latimer (D-Westchester), who is sponsoring and supporting three key bills that represents the most practical way to reduce State mandated costs on local governments—and thereby relieve local property taxpayers of higher property taxes.

The three bills were all introduced in the 2011-12 Legislative session in Albany. They are:

Medicaid Costs for Counties (A.8644 Paulin)

This would phase out the county share of Medicaid costs over a multi-year period, and would require a reduction in county taxes commensurate to the savings. Latimer points out that in 2011, Westchester County collected a total of $548 million in property taxes, and shelled out $211 million to the state to cover its share of Medicaid costs. A full reduction in this area would mean a 40 percent decrease in county taxes if fully applied to reduce taxes. Latimer is a co-sponsor of this bill.

Cap Local Government Pension Costs (A.8505 Abinanti)

Since the state capped local property taxes increased at 2 percent per year in 2011, then it must also cap—and fund the difference—of pension costs which cannot be locally controlled by the municipal government, school district or special district (library, fire etc.) at 2 percent. The rising rate of pension costs, beyond the control of any local government, swallows up more tax dollars each year.

"Only when the state faces the crisis itself will solutions be found; putting the costs of pension at the state level ensures the state will take pension costs funding seriously," Latimer argued. He is a co-sponsor of the bill.

Eliminate MTA Payroll Tax (A.5616 Latimer)

The MTA Payroll Tax is an added cost to local governments that forces up property taxes; in the City of Yonkers, it approached $700,000 per year. Mass transit must be funded at the state and federal levels directly, without relying on additional mandates to local governments that turn into property tax increases. Latimer's sponsors two bills—one an immediate elimination, the other a phased elimination—which would eliminate the charge of this tax on local governments, among others. In late 2011, Latimer and the Legislature voted to eliminate this tax for over 25,000 Westchester small businesses and public and private schools

"These three actions will address the core problem of mandates in New York State: that our state, unlike most others, requires costs to be borne by those local governments that rely primarily on property taxes to survive. That is THE single biggest reason why Westchester County and other counties rate high on the list of taxed counties," said Latimer.

"Beware of well dressed salesmen who are selling you a false bill of goods. Mandate relief does not come with partisan platitudes—it comes with very specific prescriptions to right-size government. And don't buy the political argument that one party is to blame and the other is blameless. Albany has worked for years with BOTH parties equally responsible for the decisions that led us to this point. It is cynical political manipulation, fueled by big money, that tries to convince you otherwise," he concluded.

 

Assemblyman George Latimer of Rye represents Larchmont, Mamaroneck Town and Village, Rye City, Port Chester, Rye Brook and part of New Rochelle.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Larchmont-Mamaroneck Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Too May 8, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Good question Allison, especially the STATE tax base. After all, Boston Post Road is a STATERead More highway, and any changes made to Boston Post Road will be decided upon and paid for by the STATE.
Ralph Petrillo May 3, 2013 at 01:11 am
Well there is definitely more community disapproval with the current plans then there is support. ARead More possible suggestion for the developer may be to cut the plans from 120 units to 60 units with no more then 120 parking spaces . The community is worried about the proposed plan with the idea of adding 240 to 250 additional cars a day causing congestion with respect to traffic.The developer can set aside funds to pay for a daily rush hour bus to bring his new tenants to the trains to cut down on an increase in traffic. The developer to gain public approval should give up on any non access to private roads or it maybe in the interest of the community to make some of their roads which are currently public into private roads whereby no one heading to the golf course or the condominiums could cross these private roads thereby making access to the condominiums quite difficult. As far as a gain in the tax base. with any development where there are no tax abatements, it may appear that tax revenues may increase , however it may turn out to be a zero sum game, where the additional revenue pays for new public sector costs that will come with this project from garbage, water service, police , education, and any and all other public sector costs. With development it is better for the developer to become part of the community . Orienta has great characteristics. Many in this community would like the developer to search for the mean between the extremes with respect to development.
Allison May 2, 2013 at 10:39 pm
David , can you please explain how having a luxury condominium building increases the tax base?