.
Feedback

Mamaroneck, Other FDs Assist Harrison in Major House Fire

Joint effort helps extinguish a blaze at a Harrison home.

Mamaroneck's town and village fire departments helped battle a house fire in Harrison Wednesday night.

Also assisting were Rye and Port Chester fire departments. Two ladders were raised above the home to contain the fire, which gutted the attic of the home on Puritan Woods Road, causing major damage. The homeowners were inside at the time of the fire, but were able to escape by the time authorities arrived.

Harrison Fire responded to the call at about 9:30 p.m., battling the blaze for over two hours before finally putting it out. No one was injured, including a dog that two firemen were able to rescue.

"There was heavy smoke and fire upon arrival," said Harrison Fire Chief Dino Del Signore.

Firemen initially entered the home, but were forced to retreat after a roof in the back of the house collapsed.

"As soon as the roof collapsed we got everybody out, regrouped, and started an exterior operation," said Del Signore. "Once we got it knocked out we sent the guys back inside."

The firemen inside the home were on the opposite side of the residence and were not in immediate danger when the roof fell, according to Del Signore. Firemen also cut another part of the roof to gain access to the fire.

The home, at 7 Puritan Woods Road, is a two-story, one-family, residence. Del Signore called the blaze a two-alarm fire.

Although there is significant water and smoke damage in the home, it is not uninhabitable, but will require major repairs, according to Del Signore.

The cause of the fire is still under investigation.

LMP June 17, 2010 at 01:24 pm
Journalism ?? The headline and lead paragraph do not seem to relate the the story. What story is being told? The way departments work together? A house fire? Is this here to fill "paper"? Would it be done like this if the Patch had a real cost to for "paper"?
The value of journalism relates to the way it educates it readers.
Kevin Zawacki (Editor) June 17, 2010 at 05:06 pm
LMP,
Thank you for reading, & thank you for the feedback; we've tweaked the article to make it more cohesive.
Sandra Larriva June 17, 2010 at 06:01 pm
Thank you for the feedback. I would also like to add that covering a fire in which two local fire departments collaborate is newsworthy, especially when our readers are contributing tax money to these efforts.
LMP June 20, 2010 at 02:34 am
Thank you for the follow-up.
Good journalism is essential to a democratic society and as such, "news" reporting has high responsibilities. What and how the news is reported has consequences. Elements of style generally permit the "hed" to be attention grabbing, but should reasonably relate the the main theme of the article. The "lead" is generally expected to be a concise summary of the key facts of the story. Consider that the Patch had virtually the same story, other than differences in "hed" and "lead", in its Larchmont/Mamaroneck and Harrison editions. Perhaps OK for the "hed" in some cases", much less so for the "lead". Consider also that the "Patch" reported four local FDs - Harrison, Port Chester, VOM and TOM - responded. This article told the story of a fire in Harrison. Local newsworthy yes. A story of how local FDs work together, or don't, would certainly be newsworthy as well - let's see that, it was not this article. Jefferson argued for the press even over government if forced to choose. The Patch can choose whether to accept the challenge. Good luck to all.
NYSC June 22, 2010 at 02:16 am
Now LMP, let's work on our manners here as surely you're not suggesting that house fire coverage should be getting the brow beating of, say, covering Ms. Marple's two headed hen laying three eggs--surely that would require such astute busy-body buffoonery from you.
I frankly could careless abou the hed. It was perfectly fine. I read this article when it got published (since I live near Harrison) and didn't think twice about its structure. Perhaps you should listen to our friend Jefferson who suggested be polite to all, but intimate with few. RRW p.s. It's not "lead" it's "lede." Sheesh.
LMP June 23, 2010 at 05:21 pm
Geez, nice NYSC! A welcome challenging knowledgeable voice! Jefferson, journalistic style, even if "careless" :-) , as you must be aware that it is useless to argue with those who have lost the use of reason :-)
Sorry, but in the context where used, it has been argued that both "lead" and "lede" are equivalent. IMHO, you are correct that there are more critical stories to be reported. For example, an "investigative" report on "how local FDs work together, or don't, would certainly be newsworthy".

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Larchmont-Mamaroneck Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
ellen June 4, 2013 at 02:23 pm
I have photos but it won't upload for me.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 4, 2013 at 03:47 pm
The advice we are hearing from our help desk is to clear the cache from your browser and to use theRead More best browser possible. Try Google Chrome, or Firefox. Don't forget to clear your cache!