.
Feedback

Ask the RADAR Prevention Experts

We collected the most common questions we hear from parents about teens and alcohol, and then polled our RADAR prevention experts for answers. Check back every week for new Q & As.

This spring, Larchmont-Mamaroneck Responsible Action: Drug and Alcohol Resource (RADAR) is focusing its public awareness efforts on the issue of underage drinking. A new campaign addresses parents and empowers them to take a stand against alcohol use by teens.  

The theme of the campaign, “Be A Parent, Not a Friend,” was developed to reassure parents that the role they play in the health, safety and development of their teenage children is critical.  Parents think that peers are the primary influence on the choices their teens make, but all the research shows that parents are still the most influential factor in a teenager’s life.  To support parents in their effort to understand and reduce alcohol use by teens, we collected some of the most common questions we hear from parents…and then polled our prevention experts for answers.

Check back every week for two new questions and answers.  And visit www.lmradar.org to learn more.                              

Q.  We drank when we were teens…and teens drink in Europe.  Is drinking by teenagers really so bad? 

A. With the benefit of modern science and long-term data, we now have a much better understanding of how dangerous alcohol can be for the health and safety of teens.  And it’s not just about drunk driving accidents. Studies at Duke University, and recommendations from the American Medical Association (AMA) demonstrate measurable damage to teen brains from alcohol use. And research from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) shows that teens who start drinking before age 15 are five times more likely to become alcohol dependent or abuse alcohol later in life than those who start drinking at or after age 21.  Europe, historically known for liberal drinking attitudes, has been toughening its laws as a result of excessive binge drinking and hospitalization among teens there, as well as high alcoholism and cirrhosis rates among adults. The idea that “Europe does it right” is a myth that is not supported by health or safety data. Parents today should also be aware that alcoholic drinks marketed at young people have gotten more potent in recent years:  popular products among teens today often come in 24 oz. cans with 10-13 percent alcohol by volume, versus 12 oz. bottles with 3.6-3.8 percent alcohol, 25 years ago.  

Q. There is pressure for teens to go unchaperoned to after-prom houses and spring break trips.  If I don’t want my daughter to be left out, how can I say no?  

A. The time between spring break, prom and graduation is the most dangerous of the entire school year.  The highest rate of drinking-related accidents, sexual assaults and fatalities happens during this time. If you care about the safety and welfare of your daughter, you will be clear with her that chaperones are required and that you will call to check that adults are present and no alcohol is being served.  Consider hosting an after-prom party at your house, or collaborating with other parents to organize substance-free after-prom activities. 

It can be done!  Regarding spring break, keep in mind that most high school kids don’t actually go on these trips—because of family vacations, spring sports, college visits, jobs and internships, lifeguarding courses, financial limitations, safety concerns, etc... So if your daughter doesn’t go, she certainly won’t be the only one.  In fact, feel free to use any of the aforementioned excuses.  If you really want her to go along on a group trip, then you should make plans to chaperone.   

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Larchmont-Mamaroneck Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Too May 8, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Good question Allison, especially the STATE tax base. After all, Boston Post Road is a STATERead More highway, and any changes made to Boston Post Road will be decided upon and paid for by the STATE.
Ralph Petrillo May 3, 2013 at 01:11 am
Well there is definitely more community disapproval with the current plans then there is support. ARead More possible suggestion for the developer may be to cut the plans from 120 units to 60 units with no more then 120 parking spaces . The community is worried about the proposed plan with the idea of adding 240 to 250 additional cars a day causing congestion with respect to traffic.The developer can set aside funds to pay for a daily rush hour bus to bring his new tenants to the trains to cut down on an increase in traffic. The developer to gain public approval should give up on any non access to private roads or it maybe in the interest of the community to make some of their roads which are currently public into private roads whereby no one heading to the golf course or the condominiums could cross these private roads thereby making access to the condominiums quite difficult. As far as a gain in the tax base. with any development where there are no tax abatements, it may appear that tax revenues may increase , however it may turn out to be a zero sum game, where the additional revenue pays for new public sector costs that will come with this project from garbage, water service, police , education, and any and all other public sector costs. With development it is better for the developer to become part of the community . Orienta has great characteristics. Many in this community would like the developer to search for the mean between the extremes with respect to development.
Allison May 2, 2013 at 10:39 pm
David , can you please explain how having a luxury condominium building increases the tax base?