.
Feedback

Mamaroneck Library Budget Approved By Board, Awaiting Community's Votes

The Mamaroneck Library Board met on Wednesday night to discuss the 2012-13 proposed budget. The community will have an opportunity to vote on the budget on Dec. 14.

This year’s budget for the will factor in, among other things, rising costs for state-mandated retirement benefits and one-time fees incurred in moving from the library’s old location to the new one on Prospect Avenue. 

The —which was financed through a combination of a $13 million 25-year bond and $6.5 million in private funds—was completed over the summer, giving the Mamaroneck community access to a state-of-the-art 31,300 square foot facility many times larger then the cramped quarters at the temporary location. Since its opening, the new library has attracted 1,000 new users, said Library Board Vice-President Carolyn Pomeranz.

At a little over $2.7 million, the 2012-13 budget is a 6 percent increase over the previous year’s $2.6 million.  Broken down, this includes an almost 3 percent increase in total operating expenses from $1.7 to $1.8 million and a 12 percent increase in debt service, or debt repayment, from $800,000 to $895,731 this year after the board “underforecasted bond payments” for the previous budget.

Last year's budget was about a 2 percent increase over the 2009-10 budget, and can be viewed here on the Mamaroneck Library's website.

The cost to taxpayers will be approximately $75 per year for an average assessed home of $15,000, an 18.26 percent increase in the tax levy.

In drawing up the budget, the library board faced the same dilemma echoed by municipal and local governments and heard in many local election campaigns: How to maintain the same level of service to the community in challenging economic times without passing on excessive costs to the taxpayer.

This balancing act wasn’t easy.

“We are currently operating with a bare bones staff,” said Pomeranz, who added that, whenever possible, the library utilizes volunteer staff to supplement their full-time employees.  The number of full-time staffers is currently less than in 2008, she said.

Other efforts to offset the tax burden include charging fees for meeting rooms at the library, seeking out grants and active fundraising by the board.

Some of the more significant increases included $30,000 for state-mandated retirement costs, $30,000 for fuel and utilities in a larger building and $59,000 to restore salary and payroll taxes for one staff position. Money allotted for salaries and debt repayment comprise 75 percent of the total budget.  Offsetting these increases was an $18,000 savings by restructuring the employee health insurance plan as well as a $30,000 decrease in the amount budgeted for certain items like books on DVD, periodicals and MP3s.

“Libraries are changing,” said Board Treasurer Steve Warner, referring to the availability of many formerly print-only materials online.

Additionally, the library will also be reducing its reserves from $435,000 in the 2011-12 budget to $200,000. 

“Excluding debt service increases and retirement costs, the budget would increase less than 1 percent,” said Warner, continuing, “which is what I would hope we could manage the budget at going forward."

The library budget has been separate from the Village of Mamaroneck's budget since 1992. 

The budget will be voted on by the public on Dec. 14, however, if it does not pass, the board will have to revert to the 2011-12 tax levy. This could result in a potential $330,000 cut, which could include measures such as a 25 percent staff cut, a reduction in the library’s hours, and library programs being discontinued.

“After this, we will be very mindful of increases going forward,” said Warner.

The community will be able to vote on the Mamaroneck Library budget on Dec. 14 from 7 a.m.-9 p.m.  A copy of the 2012-13 budget will be available on the library's website this week.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Larchmont-Mamaroneck Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Too May 8, 2013 at 02:53 pm
Good question Allison, especially the STATE tax base. After all, Boston Post Road is a STATERead More highway, and any changes made to Boston Post Road will be decided upon and paid for by the STATE.
Ralph Petrillo May 3, 2013 at 01:11 am
Well there is definitely more community disapproval with the current plans then there is support. ARead More possible suggestion for the developer may be to cut the plans from 120 units to 60 units with no more then 120 parking spaces . The community is worried about the proposed plan with the idea of adding 240 to 250 additional cars a day causing congestion with respect to traffic.The developer can set aside funds to pay for a daily rush hour bus to bring his new tenants to the trains to cut down on an increase in traffic. The developer to gain public approval should give up on any non access to private roads or it maybe in the interest of the community to make some of their roads which are currently public into private roads whereby no one heading to the golf course or the condominiums could cross these private roads thereby making access to the condominiums quite difficult. As far as a gain in the tax base. with any development where there are no tax abatements, it may appear that tax revenues may increase , however it may turn out to be a zero sum game, where the additional revenue pays for new public sector costs that will come with this project from garbage, water service, police , education, and any and all other public sector costs. With development it is better for the developer to become part of the community . Orienta has great characteristics. Many in this community would like the developer to search for the mean between the extremes with respect to development.
Allison May 2, 2013 at 10:39 pm
David , can you please explain how having a luxury condominium building increases the tax base?