patching...
Breaking: Astorino Vetoes Clinic Access Law Passed By Westchester County Legislators »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Consultant: Transportation at MUFSD Needs Improvement

The Board of Education hires consulting company to analyze transportation department.

 

The Mamaroneck Union Free School District's transportation department runs on an "informal basis," without a well-defined set of procedures, according to a consultant hired by the district to analyze the transportation department in terms of "operations management, routing and bell times and outsourcing."

At Tuesday's regular Board of Education meeting, a presentation was given by Tim Ammon, vice president of Management Partnership Services, Inc. According to the company's Web site, they are "a leading provider of student transportation and fleet management consulting services."

All in all, Ammon indicated that Mamaroneck UFSD is utilizing their buses to the fullest. Almost every seat is used by a student, so capacity or utilization of existing buses is good. However, criticism sprang from organizational inefficiencies within the department and district itself.

The lack of a defined set of procedures leads to the absence of good risk management, explained the consultant. If an employee quits, for instance, there may not be any other employee with the same knowledge of history. Without firm, defined, written procedures, management will have nothing from which to work, said Ammon. Also, the amount of time spent on the management of payroll within the department takes too much time away from that employee being efficient in other ways.

Ammon found that the transportation management software could be reimplemented to expand its usefulness. This way, everyone can use it to support the district as a whole and not just one department. He calls this "capture, categorize and manage the system."

On a practical level, the schools in Mamaroneck have the same "bell times," which means that buses can only do one route per day. If the bell times were staggered, then buses could be "recycled" and work throughout the day on more than one route.

The Princeton Plan Analysis was also considered, whereby the schools would be grade-specific instead of zone- or neighborhood-specific. For example, Murray Avenue School might be K to 2nd grade and Mamaroneck Avenue School would take the 3rd to 5th grades. MPS found, however, that this scenario would result in a greater number of students eligible for busing and therefore greater costs in general.

And then there is outsourcing. While Ammon admitted that outsourcing could save the district approximately 13 percent per year, he generally does not recommend it unless the scenario could save the client much more than 10 percent. Mamaroneck would be right on the cusp.

A significant cost to all New York school districts is the transportation of students to private and parochial schools. Though mandated by the state, public school districts do have the option to choose public transportation for these students as an alternative in certain circumstances. While there are many issues, including safety, to consider with public transportation, shared buses among adjoining districts is also a possibility to cut costs.

There are many factors that go into this analysis, all of which will be in a final detailed report that will be available to the Board of Education and the public in a week or so, according to Mr. Ammon. Keep checking the Mamaroneck UFSD Web site for updates.

At the beginning of the meeting, new Superintendent of Schools Dr. Robert Shaps took a few minutes to report that Mamaroneck schools had a "smooth opening" and are proceeding "full steam ahead."

If anyone is wondering what Shaps has in store for the district, or has a question for him, he is holding several 'meet the superintendent' meetings for students, parents, staff and community. The next two will be held in the Hommock's library on September 23 at 3:30 p.m., and September 29 at 7:30 p.m.

The next regular monthly Board of Education meeting will be on Tuesday, Oct. 19 at 7:30 p.m. in the tiered classroom.

Balar Gazor

5:50 pm on Wednesday, September 22, 2010

There appears to be a Director of Transportation on the District staff. Presumably he will be able to shed light on the reasons why his dpt has been operating without procedures, and what he is spending his valuable time on, instead of defining quality procedures.

Reply

LMF

11:53 am on Thursday, September 23, 2010

Consider the source...consultant's are paid to "find" and "recommend" change...or else who needs 'em! The consultant's use of "informal" and "without...procedures" is confusing and cuts too broadly . The Director of Transportation is forced to spend 95% of his time with State and District mandated paperwork. The actual day-to-day operation remains in the hands of the dispatcher , who, of course, follows State DOE guidlines and rules. It works well. Any procedural gaps are District-based, not departmental . What's missing in this article is the consultant's remarks regarding how impressed he was with Transportation employees overall , their dedication and long-term committment to the students. All this , with a fleet of vehicles that needed to be replaced years ago! I'm a District homeowner and taxpayer and but let's be realistic..transportation is 2% of a $120 million budget... get real!!

Reply

Rosa Quintana

12:46 pm on Thursday, September 23, 2010

As a long-time village resident whose grandchildren now attend District schools , I have to agree that the bus fleet in Mamaroneck needs an update! Board of Eds are notorious for allocating expenditures only through an annual mindset. Moreso, in tight economic times we need to be mindful of the future. All of us have had to replace a vehicle. Amortize it! Nobody says it has to be "all-or-nothing " for a one-year budget!! Used busses (2-yrs old) with low mileage can be had for half the cost of new ones and spreading the cost over 5 years makes it very affordable. The fuel/emission gains plus federal funds now available to replace polluting vehicles make it even more of a win-win situation (I did a little research) . Seems the only thing lacking at the MUFSD is a decision-maker!!

Reply

LMP

1:30 pm on Saturday, October 9, 2010

This, the tip of the iceberg perhaps.

Where else in the District will we find a lack of optimized procedures and management? From a consultant in Greece perhaps :-) ?

Is MUFSD's average "cost per pupil", compared to other districts in New York and nationally, reflected in the education it delivers, in "results"?

Will the District's "new" focus on "measurement" - of students - measure end-of-year performance or will it measure the contribution of the District to the students' education over the year? May be a big difference when socioeconomic and other factors are considered.

What other things will the District measure?

Reply

Leave a comment